OSX Finder Replacement [Update]

A while back I wrote something about Path Finder as a probable Finder substitute. Well, it's been a couple of months, and I must say that  I'm still using the crappy Apple Finder.

Why? Well, I guess that it kinda grows on you, eventhough Path Finder has 'some' neat features. It just didn't feel like a real substitute. It felt more like an add-on.

So, back to Finder with its little annoyances like;

• Not being able to move or delete files when the OS is busy creating the thumbnails.
• No Cut&Paste (⌘-x, ⌘-v) in the file system.
• ⌘-o to open files instead of hitting the Enter-key.
• Sort folders before files. Not mixing them.
• Clock/Date format (I want the date also to be visible).
• Manual refresh option for (share) folders.
• etc.
  

I have high hopes up for Snow Leopard. Hope that Finder gets a real good overhaul.

Photography Seems Equal To Terrorism

... Well, at least in some places.

Even though it's categorized as fun, it's not funny at all. Photography is not a crime, as long as you're not photographing state secrets or plans of the new nuclear power plant.

New Gear

:D

Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G AF-S VR IF-ED

Fork Experiment

An assignment from the local camera club.... No idea if this is gonna be the final result. We'll see. I've got till March for this assignment.

More photos on my flickr page.

Move To Hosting Provider

When you're reading this it will mean that I've moved my website to an external hosting service. This has some drawbacks:

• The SymCAImport tool will be available through another URL (http://symcaimport.redelijkheid.com /symcaimport/). I also editted all previous posts with the old SymCAImport URL.
• Some other services will also be moved to other locations. More on that when they are up and running.

The advantages are a more reliable uptime, and faster up- and download speeds.

There might be some things I might have missed in the transfer. Leave a comment if you find errors or strange behaviour on the website.

UPDATE: I forgot the MIME type settings on the SymCAImport tool. If you did encounter problems importing, you might wanna try again. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Update on OSX GPS Logging Software

It's been a while since I used the MTK software for getting GPS logs from my QStarz GPS BT Q1000 travel recorder. This weekend I was surprised to see that the developpers had updated the application interface (among other things). The new version is a JAVA applet, which can be installed in your Applications folder, or it can be run online ('no' installation required).

No installation is not entirely correct, because you still need the USB drivers AND you need to create a directory and set certain filesystem rights.

In short:

• Install the required USB drivers for OSX
  
• Create the required directory by entering the following commands in the Terminal.app

sudo mkdir /var/lock
sudo chmod 777 /var/lock

It's possible that there's a prompt for an admin password.

• Run the Application (or install it).
  You need to trust the signed JAVA application. If you don't, the application will not run.
• Launch the application and switch the GPS logger on (log-mode)
• Press connect, and you're good to go.

I'm definitely looking forward to the maps integration (development version only at this moment).

Panasonic Lumix LX3 Annoyance

The LX3 is in my possession for a couple of weeks, and last weekend I noticed something annoying. When I imported the photos in Adobe Lightroom, some of the photos were imported as RAW, and some as JPG.

By default I set my cameras on RAW (if they support it). When I purchased the LX3 there was no RAW importer for Lightroom or Photoshop, so I shot in RAW+JPG. This way I could see the photos and could work with the RAW files when a proper RAW converter (Adobe Camera RAW) cae along.

I checked the format settings and these were set at RAW, so where did those JPG's came from?
After some searching I found that the iA mode of the camera (intelligent Auto) decides which image quality setting to use. Something I didn't find in the manual (or I read over it).

Anyway, it's annoying as hell.

PGP Desktop Updates

I've been a PGP user for quite a while now. A couple of years ago I bought the software (before that I used the free PGP versions). My original license was for version 8.x. Every once in a while that would be a message indicating that there was a new version available.

The last couple of months there were no new messages, and when I checked for updates from the application the default message was "you're running the latest version".

But according to the PGP website there were newer versions (9.8, 9.9). So I 'registered' for an evaluation version and installed that over my existing 9.7 version.
After the reboot everything worked. My (old existing) license is still valid. So why is PGP not telling that there's an upgrade available?

I guess the fun will end with the release of version 10.
B.t.w. I still find it frustrating that they removed the SIGN and ENCRYPT buttons/functionality from within Apple Mail.app. I don't want to sign all my outgoing mail (which happens when you configure the mail proxy settings). I want to be in total control :)

Broken SSL Trust

WebTrust broken?When a CA issues a SSL certificate they (the registration authority) should verify certain information provided by the requester. This includes at least the domain name ownership and preferably the person or company tied to the domain name ownership. Basic stuff really, but what happens when certificates get issued without any verification? Well, this happened to Mozilla [2].

Basically the complete trust framework collapses (for that CA). Especially combined with hosts file and/or DNS hijacking. What if this incident isn't the first? What if some cybercrook got some SSL certs due to similar mistakes of your favorite bank? You're no longer sure if the https connection of your bank really terminates on the servers of your bank. They could just as easily terminate on a server in Russia or Albania. Which leaves you with an empty bank account (most likely).

If the certificate is issued (signed) by a Comodo Root CA (as it was in this case), your browser accepts this as a valid/trusted CA and for the user everything seems fine. This takes me back to the issue of all those trusted root certification authorities in the average OS or browser.
This time, it's a Comodo affiliate that's screwed up (there's no other way of describing this), but what are the chances that some of those trusted 100+ CA's make a mistake? The bigger the list, the bigger the chance of wrongfully issues (SSL) certificates.

By the way, if you're using an older browser (pre IE6 e.g.), chances are that SSL certificate revocation checking is disabled by default. So even when the revoke they certificate you still wouldn't know.... You can verifiy this by opening the Internet Explorer options section and checking the Advanced tab.